Nettet26. sep. 2024 · He or she can, however, make examiner’s amendments (see MPEP § 1302.04) and has authority to enter amendments submitted after Notice of Allowance of an application which embody merely the correction of formal matters in the specification or drawing, or formal matters in a claim without changing the scope thereof, or the … Nettet26. sep. 2024 · The Patent Trial Appeal Board affirmed the rejection(s) against independent claim(s) [1], but reversed all rejections against claim(s) [2] dependent …
Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) - United States …
Nettet13. apr. 2024 · Then why is the PTAB affirming Examiner rejections that don’t meet this basic requirement for a prima facie rejection under Section 101—that each claim is examined “clearly and specifically” and... NettetIn Wertheim, the USPTO rejected Wertheim’s patent application over disclosures in a U.S. patent (“Pfluger IV”). The office relied on Pfluger IV as §102 (e) prior art as of Pfluger IV’s earliest claimed priority date (“Pfluger I”). The Pfluger IV patent was filed as a continuation application from “Pfluger III,” which was a ... contractors in sioux city ia
Manual of Patent Examining Procedure - Wikipedia
Nettet16. feb. 2024 · The affirmance of the rejection of a claim on any of the grounds specified constitutes a general affirmance of the decision of the examiner on that claim, except … Nettet13. aug. 2024 · MPEP 2259clarifies that when claims are finally held as "not invalid" by a federal court, even after appeals, those claims may still be subject to reexamination because res judicata,based on a court holding in an infringement proceeding, is not applicable in reexamination proceedings sine the Office was not a party to the litigation. Nettet16. feb. 2024 · The examiner’s amendment should indicate that the changes were authorized, the date and type of interview, and with whom it was held. The examiner’s … contractors in siskiyou county